|

BLOG
Tavil LAW, PA NEWS

GET THE LEGAL ASSISTANCE YOU REQUIRE AT THIS MOMENT

|

March 24, 2025
Driving Under the Influence (DUI) is a serious offense in Florida, with strict penalties that can have lasting consequences. If you're a Florida resident or just visiting, it's crucial to understand the basics of DUI law to stay informed and avoid costly mistakes. In this blog post, we will cover what DUI means in Florida, the legal limits, penalties, and steps you can take if you find yourself facing a DUI charge. What is DUI? Florida Statute 316.193 - Driving Under the Influence (DUI). DUI stands for "Driving Under the Influence," and in Florida, it typically refers to driving a vehicle while impaired by alcohol, drugs, or any other substances that can affect your ability to operate a vehicle safely. The state has strict laws in place to ensure that drivers stay sober behind the wheel and that those who are impaired face consequences. Legal Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) Limits In Florida, the legal limit for Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) is: 0.08% BAC for drivers over 21 years old 0.02% BAC for drivers under 21 (Zero Tolerance Law) Any measurable amount of drugs for drivers impaired by drugs (including prescription medication, marijuana, or illegal substances) If a law enforcement officer pulls you over and suspects you are under the influence, they may request a chemical test to measure your BAC or test for drugs. Refusing a chemical test could lead to penalties like automatic driver's license suspension, even without a conviction. Penalties for DUI in Florida - Florida Statute 322.64 - Penalties for DUI DUI penalties in Florida can range from fines to jail time, depending on the severity of the offense and whether it's your first or subsequent offense. Here's a breakdown of potential penalties: First Offense: Fines: $500 to $1,000 License Suspension: 180 days to 1 year Imprisonment: Up to 6 months in jail Probation: Up to 12 months Community Service: 50 hours of community service may be required DUI School: Attendance at DUI education program 2. Second Offense: Fines: $1,000 to $2,000 License Suspension: 5 years (if second offense within 5 years of the first) Imprisonment: Up to 9 months DUI School: Required 3. Third Offense: Fines: $2,000 to $5,000 License Suspension: Up to 10 years Imprisonment: Up to 5 years in prison Probation: Possible probationary sentence 4. Aggravating Factors: Injury or Death: If the DUI results in injury or death to another person, the charges and penalties will be significantly more severe, including possible felony charges. BAC of 0.15% or higher: A BAC level of 0.15% or higher may result in harsher penalties, such as larger fines and mandatory imprisonment. Florida’s Implied Consent Law - Florida Statute 316.1932 - Tests for Alcohol or Controlled Substances: Florida operates under an "Implied Consent Law," which means that by driving in the state, you automatically consent to a chemical test if a police officer has probable cause to suspect you are under the influence. If you refuse to take the test, you will face an automatic license suspension, regardless of whether you are convicted of DUI. Florida Statute 322.2615 - Refusal to Submit to Testing Refusal Penalties: First Refusal: 1-year driver's license suspension Second Refusal (within 5 years): 18-month suspension  DUI Checkpoints and Enforcement Florida law enforcement is proactive in preventing impaired driving, and DUI checkpoints are common, especially during holidays or weekends. Police officers are permitted to stop vehicles at these checkpoints without having a specific reason to suspect a driver. At a checkpoint, they will assess the driver for signs of impairment, and if they believe the driver is intoxicated, they may conduct further tests. What to Do If You’re Arrested for DUI in Florida If you find yourself arrested for DUI, it’s essential to know your rights and take the right steps: Stay Calm and Respectful: If stopped by law enforcement, always stay calm, remain polite, and provide identification when asked. Understand Your Rights: You have the right to remain silent and consult an attorney. If arrested, you can refuse to answer any questions except to provide your name and basic information. Request an Attorney: If arrested, ask for an attorney as soon as possible. Legal counsel can help you navigate the complexities of DUI law and may offer advice on challenging the evidence. Challenge the Charges: Florida DUI cases can be contested. There are defenses such as challenging the legality of the stop, questioning the reliability of the field sobriety tests, or challenging the chemical test results. How to Avoid a DUI in Florida Prevention is always better than facing legal consequences. Here are some tips to avoid getting a DUI charge in Florida: Designate a Driver: If you're planning to drink, make sure you have a sober driver or arrange for a ride home. Use Ride-Sharing Apps: Services like Uber and Lyft are a great way to avoid getting behind the wheel if you've been drinking. Stay Within Legal Limits: Keep track of your alcohol consumption and know your limits, especially if you're planning to drive afterward. Avoid Driving Under the Influence of Drugs: Even prescription medication can impair your ability to drive, so always read labels and consult your doctor. DUI laws in Florida are strict, and the consequences of a conviction can be severe. Whether it's your first offense or you’ve been arrested before, it’s important to take DUI charges seriously and understand your rights and responsibilities. If you’re ever charged with DUI in Florida, seeking legal advice from an experienced attorney can make a significant difference in the outcome of your case. By understanding the basics of DUI law in Florida, you can better protect yourself, your driving privileges, and the safety of others on the road. Stay informed and make responsible choices when it comes to driving under the influence. Contact Tavil Law, PA.
January 3, 2025
The Florida Supreme Court’s amendments to civil procedure rules, set to take effect on January 1, 2025, represent a major shift in how civil litigation is handled in Florida’s state courts. These changes, made with the goal of streamlining the litigation process and aligning state court procedures more closely with federal rules, will profoundly impact both the way attorneys handle cases and how clients engage in the litigation process. The changes aim to expedite case resolution, reduce delays, and make the system more predictable. Below is a detailed exploration of these new rules and their implications: 1. Upfront Discovery Disclosures: Rule 1.280 One of the most immediate and significant changes is the introduction of upfront discovery disclosures . This change requires parties to provide detailed information to the opposing party within 60 days of the complaint being served. Key Disclosures: Individuals with discoverable information : Each party must disclose the names, addresses, and phone numbers of individuals likely to have relevant information, along with a description of the information they may have. Documents : Parties must provide a description (or copy) of documents they may use to support their claims or defenses, including their location. Damages Computation : A detailed calculation of damages claimed must be provided, along with supporting documents. Insurance Policies : A copy of any insurance policy that might cover the claims must also be disclosed. This requirement means that clients must gather and provide most of their documents and information before or very early in the litigation process. This is a stark departure from previous practices where discovery (e.g., gathering evidence, requesting documents) could take place after the lawsuit was filed or after service of process. Now, both parties will need to prepare these disclosures early, ensuring a more transparent and quicker process right from the start. Impact on Clients: Clients will need to be more proactive and organized in collecting documents and information. Legal teams will need to begin the discovery process almost immediately after filing, reducing the time for investigation. Clients can expect a faster and more open exchange of documents and data, which may make the process feel more intense and urgent. 2. Proportional Discovery and Supplementation: Rule 1.280 Under the amended Rule 1.280, discovery must be proportional to the needs of the case. This means that the scope of discovery will be measured by factors such as: The importance of the issues at stake in the litigation . The amount in controversy . The parties' resources . The significance of the discovery to the case . Additionally, parties are required to supplement their disclosures and discovery responses whenever new information becomes available. A failure to supplement may result in sanctions or exclusion of that information in later stages of the case. Impact on Clients: Clients can expect to see more control over the scope and depth of discovery, as the focus will now be on what is actually relevant and necessary. However, there is still a requirement to keep the opposing side informed if new evidence or information arises, potentially making litigation more dynamic. 3. Expedited Case Management: Rule 1.200 Rule 1.200 has been completely overhauled to impose a structured timeline for case management. Case management orders will now be required within 120 days of filing a lawsuit and will classify cases into three tracks: Streamlined cases : Expected to be resolved within 12 months . General cases : Expected to be resolved within 18 months . Complex cases : Expected to be resolved within 30 months . This track assignment will guide the entire litigation process, ensuring that cases progress according to predetermined schedules. The court must issue specific deadlines for each phase of the litigation, and the parties must comply with these deadlines without delay. Impact on Clients: Strict adherence to deadlines : Failure to meet deadlines or seek timely extensions can result in sanctions. This puts pressure on clients to move quickly through the litigation process. The litigation process will be more predictable, with clear timelines for when to expect actions and resolutions. Clients will need to prepare to proceed with the case swiftly, even while exploring settlement options or negotiating with other parties. 4. Restrictions on Continuances and Extensions: Rule 1.460 & Rule 1.090 The amendments to Rule 1.460 severely restrict the ability to obtain continuances. Once a trial date is set, the court is strongly discouraged from granting continuances unless there is good cause . Furthermore, any motion for continuance must include specific dates for when the issue (e.g., witness availability) will be resolved, so that a new trial date can be promptly set. Similarly, Rule 1.090 has been revised to require good cause for requesting extensions of time, and excusable neglect if the request is made after the deadline has passed. Impact on Clients: Clients will likely face fewer opportunities for delays or adjustments to the litigation schedule. Legal teams will need to be diligent about meeting deadlines and preparing for trial, as any delay could be viewed unfavorably by the court. 5. Amendments to Summary Judgment Process: Rule 1.510 The amendments to Rule 1.510 introduce tighter timelines in the summary judgment process. Under the new rule: Responses to summary judgment motions must be filed within 40 days of the motion’s filing. Hearings on motions for summary judgment cannot occur sooner than 10 days after the expiration of the response deadline. This change is intended to streamline the summary judgment process and ensure that cases are not stalled unnecessarily by delays in responding to motions. Impact on Clients: Clients should expect that if summary judgment motions are filed, the response time will be faster, meaning decisions may be made more quickly. Legal counsel must be prepared to act quickly to respond to motions and advance their case. 6. Specificity in Objections and Sanctions: Interrogatories & Requests for Production The rules governing interrogatories and requests for production have been updated to require more specificity in objections . For example: Objections to interrogatories must be clearly stated, and any objections not raised are deemed waived . Objections to requests for production must specify if any documents are being withheld due to the objection. Failure to properly object can result in sanctions, including the possibility of a jury being instructed to view the party’s non-compliance unfavorably. Impact on Clients: Clients will need to ensure that their attorneys are meticulous about raising valid and specific objections during discovery. Inaccurate or incomplete objections could weaken a party’s case or result in negative outcomes during trial. 7. Early Trial Date & Amended Pleadings One of the significant changes is that trial dates can be set before the pleadings are closed . In the past, trial dates could only be set once the parties had finished amending their pleadings. Now, this no longer delays the setting of trial dates, which could lead to earlier and more fixed trial schedules. Moreover, amendments to pleadings will no longer be a valid reason to delay a trial, meaning parties must be ready to go to trial once it is set. Impact on Clients: Clients must be ready for trial earlier in the process, even if there are still pending changes or updates to the legal arguments. Preparing for trial becomes an ongoing process, and clients may have less time to amend their cases or delay proceedings. 8. New Rule for Motion Conferral: Rule 1.202 New Rule 1.202 requires parties to confer in good faith before filing any non-dispositive motions (i.e., motions that do not seek a final resolution of the case). This rule mandates specific certifications about the efforts made to resolve disputes without court intervention. Impact on Clients: Clients may experience additional negotiation and resolution efforts before formal motions are filed, potentially reducing the number of court hearings. Sanctions can be imposed if the required conferral process is not followed, which could delay the resolution of a case. Conclusion In sum, these rule changes introduce a faster-paced, more structured, and less flexible litigation process in Florida. Clients will face more compressed timelines, more rigorous requirements for document production, and limited opportunities for extensions or continuances. Legal teams will need to work more efficiently and proactively, and clients must be prepared to engage in the litigation process more quickly and with greater attention to detail than ever before. These changes are designed to make litigation more predictable and streamlined but will require careful planning and execution on the part of clients and their legal counsel.
By Peterson Tavil, Esq. December 11, 2024
In the complex landscape of U.S. immigration law, seeking asylum can take two distinct paths: affirmative and defensive asylum applications. These processes are crucial for individuals fleeing persecution and navigating the intricate legal framework designed to protect them. Affirmative Asylum Application Process The affirmative asylum process is intended for individuals not currently in removal proceedings. Applicants proactively submit their case to the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), a division of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). During this process, applicants present evidence of persecution and their reasons for seeking refuge. If the USCIS asylum officer denies the application, the individual may be referred to removal proceedings, where they can renew their asylum request through the defensive process before an immigration judge. Defensive Asylum Application Process Conversely, the defensive asylum process is for individuals already in removal proceedings, often due to being apprehended in the U.S. without proper documentation or violating immigration status. In this process, asylum is sought as a defense against removal. Applicants file their asylum application directly with an immigration judge at the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) within the Department of Justice. Access to Legal Representation Both affirmative and defensive applicants have the right to legal representation. However, it is important to note that, unlike in criminal court, the government does not provide attorneys in immigration proceedings for those unable to afford counsel. Therefore, securing competent legal representation is vital for successfully navigating the asylum process. Alternative Forms of Protection: Withholding of Removal and CAT Beyond asylum, there are additional protections for individuals facing persecution. Withholding of Removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT) offer alternatives for safeguarding individuals from deportation. Withholding of Removal: This protection is available to individuals who can demonstrate a likelihood of encountering persecution if returned to their home countries based on race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion. While those granted withholding of removal are not eligible for a green card, they can remain and work legally in the U.S. Relief under CAT: Individuals who fear torture in their home countries may qualify for relief under CAT by proving they are more likely than not to face torture, either directly by the government or with its acquiescence, if returned. Conclusion Understanding the distinctions between affirmative and defensive asylum applications, along with alternative forms of protection, is essential for individuals seeking refuge from persecution in their home countries. These processes provide critical avenues to secure safety and protection in the United States amid the complexities of immigration law. If you need help with your asylum case, call Tavil Law 407-457-2095 or email us at tavillawpa@gmail.com .
Show More
Share by: